Âé¶¹ÒùÔº


This article has been reviewed according to Science X's and . have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

peer-reviewed publication

trusted source

proofread

Bonobos refuse to participate when faced with unequal rewards

bonobo
Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain

The question of whether non-human animals have a sense of fairness has been widely debated. Some studies suggest that primates and other cooperative species show an aversion to inequity, while others argue that responses to unequal rewards can be explained by frustration, social disappointment, or food expectations.

To better understand the evolutionary origins of fairness, researchers from the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology and Utrecht University therefore investigated inequity in bonobos, one of humans' closest relatives.

The study was conducted at the Wolfgang Köhler Primate Research Center at the Leipzig Zoo with six bonobos. The researchers conducted two rounds of experiments using established inequity paradigms: one in which the bonobos exchanged tokens for rewards, and another in which they tested whether their reactions might have been caused by disappointment in the experimenter. The study is in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

Bonobos refused to cooperate if treated unfairly

The results showed that bonobos refused to participate more often when they received a lesser reward than their partner. Unlike chimpanzees, their responses could not be explained by disappointment alone, supporting the idea that bonobos genuinely recognize and respond to unfair treatment.

"We found that bonobos more often refused to participate when faced with inequitable rewards," explains first author Kia Radovanović from Utrecht University. "Unlike chimpanzees, their reactions were not simply due to disappointment with the experimenter, but reflected a genuine aversion to unequal treatment."

Interestingly, bonobos were more tolerant of inequity when interacting with closely affiliated partners, similar to patterns seen in humans. This suggests that social bonds may influence reactions to fairness, reinforcing the idea that inequity aversion has evolved as a stabilizing force for cooperation.

"This study provides new insights into how fairness may have evolved, but further research is needed," says Daniel Haun, Director at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. "Testing larger groups of bonobos and examining inequity aversion in naturalistic cooperation settings will be key to refining our understanding."

The findings contribute to the ongoing debate on aversion and highlight as a unique model for studying the evolution of fairness.

More information: Kia Radovanović et al, Bonobos respond aversively to unequal reward distributions, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (2025).

Journal information: Proceedings of the Royal Society B

Provided by Max Planck Society

Citation: Bonobos refuse to participate when faced with unequal rewards (2025, April 16) retrieved 27 April 2025 from /news/2025-04-bonobos-unequal-rewards.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Bonobos and chimps offer clues to how our early ancestors had sex for social purposes

210 shares

Feedback to editors