This article has been reviewed according to Science X's and . have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:
fact-checked
peer-reviewed publication
trusted source
proofread
Up to 42% of insect behavioral experiments not reproducible across laboratories

If an experiment is repeated under similar conditions, the results should be the same. In reality, the situation is often different—scientists speak of a "reproducibility crisis," which affects different disciplines.
A recent study by an 11-member research team from the Universities of Münster, Bielefeld and Jena has provided evidence that some results of behavioral experiments with insects cannot be fully reproduced. Nevertheless, at least half of the findings in the various experiments could successfully be reproduced. Depending on the different definitions and methods used to determine reproducibility, the non-reproducible results ranged from 17 to 42%.
Reproducibility is studied intensively in biomedical research and in behavioral research on mammals. However, there are no comparable systematic studies on insects. The team led by behavioral biologist Prof Helene Richter from the University of Münster has now used a multi-laboratory approach to test the reproducibility of ecological insect studies.
They conducted three different behavioral experiments. For each experiment, the researchers used a different insect species (turnip sawfly, meadow grasshopper and red flour beetle). They carried out all three studies in laboratories in Münster, Bielefeld and Jena and compared the results.
The experiments examined the effects of starvation on behavior in larvae of the turnip sawfly, the relationship between body color and preferred substrate color in grasshoppers and the choice of habitat in red flour beetles. The findings are in the journal PLOS Biology.
To the research team's knowledge, the study is the first to systematically demonstrate that behavioral studies on insects can also be affected by poor reproducibility. This was particularly surprising as insect studies generally used comparatively large sample sizes and could therefore provide more robust results.
However, reproducibility was higher compared to other systematic replication studies that were not carried out on insects. This suggested that reproducibility problems are less severe in insect studies than in other areas of science.
The results are of particular interest to scientists in behavioral biology and ecology, but also for all other disciplines in which behavioral experiments are carried out with animals. The deliberate introduction of systematic variations could improve reproducibility in studies with living organisms, the research team concludes.
More information: Carolin Mundinger et al, Testing the reproducibility of ecological studies on insect behavior in a multi-laboratory setting identifies opportunities for improving experimental rigor, PLOS Biology (2025).
Journal information: PLoS Biology
Provided by University of Münster